Chicken Road Studio's founders are growing revenue across borders while deliberately refusing to grow headcount. Here's how the numbers work.
Chicken Road Studio's revenue has climbed across new markets while staff numbers stayed flat. CHART: BAY STREET BULLETIN
Most founders treat hiring as a proxy for progress. The three people behind Chicken Road Studio treat it as a last resort — and so far the maths is on their side.
The Toronto game studio, founded last year, has pushed its single title into roughly 30 markets in under twelve months. Over the same period its payroll has not moved: still three founders, plus a small bench of contractors brought in only for defined pieces of work.
"Every full-time hire is a permanent fixed cost and a permanent coordination tax," one of the founders told the Bulletin. "We'd rather automate the repeatable work and reserve human time for the decisions that actually move revenue."
The model leans on three things: a productised game that ships to partners through one integration, a near-fully automated onboarding pipeline, and revenue that scales with player volume rather than with the size of the team. Add a market, and costs barely move; add a partner, and the same code base does the work.
It is an old idea — operating leverage — applied with unusual discipline. Analysts who follow small private software firms say the approach is increasingly common among founder-led teams that watched the last cycle's over-hiring end in layoffs.
Staying small has limits. Key-person risk is real, and a single outage or compliance miss lands on very few shoulders. The founders concede the point, but argue that tight scope is exactly what lets three people hold the whole system in their heads.
"We're not anti-hiring," the founder said. "We're anti-hiring-out-of-habit. The day a role clearly earns more than it costs, we'll fill it. Not before."
We use cookies for analytics. By clicking Accept you agree. See our Privacy Policy.